quote:

---

Ska vi slå vad Martin.M .
Om jag lyckas plocka ut den i ett blindtest med separat DAC1 så får jag din SB3:a.
Om du har rätt d.v.s. jag hade fel så hade du rätt s.a.s. och du har bevisat för forumet dess förträfflighet!

Antar du utmaningen?
Du verkar ju så säker på din sak ang. denna "mirakelmaskin" så du har ju inget att förlora eller hur...
Eller tror du kanske at jag skulle plocka den i ett blindtest så att du är rädd att förlora den?



Mvh Magnus Eriksson

---

quote:

---

Om du har rätt d.v.s. jag hade fel så hade du rätt s.a.s. och du har bevisat för forumet dess förträfflighet!

---

quote:

---

Enligt uppgift blir en Transporter klart bättre än SB3 + Benchmark DAC, men jag har själv inte hört någondera (kör SB3 digitalt till min Meridian).

En SB3 är begränsad till 48/24, Transporter klarar 96/24.

Transportern kan ju också fungera som en högklassig DAC för andra apparater som kan kopplas in i den, kan vara värt att veta vid en jämförelse.

Jag vet inte om man fortfarande inkluderar en SB3 i priset tillsammans med en Transporter, det gjorde man i alla fall tidigare.


varför blir transporten bättre om du kör klämlådan digitalt vidare till ex en Benchmark?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

quote:

---

2006 Editor's Choice

Slim Devices Squeezebox WiFi D/A processor ($249–$299; reviewed by John Atkinson, Vol.29 No.9, September 2006 review)

Following the furrow plowed by last year's "Editor's Choice," Apple's Airport Express, my 2006 pick makes it even easier for audiophiles to distribute CD-quality sound throughout their homes. In a poll on our website last September, 25% of respondents felt that the magazine was "losing the plot" with its coverage of music-server devices such as the Squeezebox. Rich Foster's response was typical: "I don't mind you covering things like [the Sonos gear] or iPod-related gear, as long as they are kept in perspective. These items are nice for convenience or portability, but they are not high-end equipment. Stereophile has always been about sonic purity."

But "sonic purity" is indeed the point of these devices, in that they are not restricted to nasty-sounding, devitalized MP3s; they also handle lossless-compressed audio files and even uncompressed, true "CD quality" files. And the fact that they feature digital data outputs means that they can feed the D/A processor of a true high-end rig. In my auditioning of the Squeezebox used in this manner, any sonic compromises resulting from the use of my WiFi network to transmit audio data around the home were minimal, and vastly outweighed by the sheer convenience of being able to access the music library residing on a remote server from the comfort of my listening chair.

The Squeezebox nicely complements a high-end, LP-based system by offering convenience and CD-quality sound for those times when the busy audiophile can't give his or her full attention to the music. The "open-source" nature of the Squeezebox's SlimServer software allows it to stay abreast of new developments, and the Squeezebox itself is an elegant piece of kit. At $299 for the WiFi model and just $249 for the hardwired Ethernet version, what excuse does an audiophile need not to join the 21st century?

In that same website poll, Dave Mueller nicely summed it up: "At its core, the magazine is about helping us enjoy our music with the best possible quality. . . . [T]he digital realm needs that sort of direction probably more than other mediums."

---

quote:

---

2006 Joint Budget Products of the Year

Rega Apollo CD player
Revel Concerta F12 loudspeaker
Slim Devices Squeezebox WiFi D/A processor

What really got JA dancing, though, was the Slim Devices Squeezebox ($249–$299), a WiFi D/A processor that allows music files to be played on a conventional audio system and comes with a handy-dandy remote control. The Squeezebox soon became JA's primary source for leisurely listening, and the sound it produced while driving a high-end DAC from its digital output persuaded him to buy the review sample. In our mid-April eNewsletter, JA shouted with glee: "Physical discs seem so 20th century!" And, in a recent review.stereophile.com poll, 51% of participants said that our coverage of the music-server market is a sure sign that we're "on the trail of the next audio revolution." Slim Devices seems poised to be a part of that revolution.

---

quote:

---

Jag tycker redan det är krungligt nok att kopiera dom vanliga CD med kopiskyt.

---

quote:

---

Hur fixar du det?

---