| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| more10 |
Posted - 2011/03/29 : 14:37:05
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4083/the-sandy-bridge-review-intel-core-i7-2600k-i5-2500k-core-i3-2100-tested/7.
quote:
What happens when you try to play 23.976 fps content on a display that refreshes itself 24.000 times per second? You get a repeated frame approximately every 40 seconds to synchronize the source frame rate with the display frame rate. That repeated frame appears to your eyes as judder in motion, particularly evident in scenes involving a panning camera.
Om man inte står ut får man skaffa ett grafikkort. Radeon HD 5450 drar bara 19W och kostar 5-6 hundra. |
| 1 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| more10 |
Posted - 2011/04/06 : 20:25:11
http://www.missingremote.com/review/intel-sandy-bridge-core-i5-2500k-and-dh67bl-motherboard#24p
quote:
Maybe it is an Easter egg or just an alpha feature that Intel is not quite ready to share, but there is definitely something interesting going on after disabling User Access Control (UAC). While 23.973 is not perfect, it is very close and after observing the feature in the last two driver revisions on both x86 and x64 it does not seem to be an anomaly. Huzzah! Obviously this is less than ideal, because while UAC can be annoying I think it is a valuable feature that provides an extra degree of protection from malicious software. Hopefully proper refresh rates will become an official, supported feature without the need for this change in the future.
Det är alltså en driverfråga. I dagsläget måste man stänga av UAC (User Access Control) för att det ska bli rätt framerate. Förhoppningsvis kommer Intel att fixa drivern så småningom. |
|
|
All Forums
The Sandy Bridge Review: Intel Core i7-2600K, i5-2
